Sound Transit Sacrifices Light Rail to Ballard, Moves Long-Deferred Graham Station Forward, in Latest “Realignment” Plan

By Erica C. Barnett

The Sound Transit board voted to approve a new “affordable” light rail plan on Thursday afternoon that indefinitely defers construction of light rail to Ballard, builds rail to West Seattle without a planned station on SW Avalon Way, and adds the long-deferred Graham Street Station back to the list of “fully funded” projects.

The cuts, or “realignment,” are Sound Transit’s response to a projected $34.5 billion budget shortfall over the next two decades. In order to restore Ballard and other projects that voters approved in the 2016 Sound Transit 3 plan, the agency will have to come up with between $9 billion and $11 billion in new revenues or cost savings.

The Ballard extension, which would include stops at Seattle Center and NW Market St. would have had the highest ridership in the entire system, with around 150,000 daily boardings—a point City Councilmember Dan Strauss, who represents the neighborhood, has made repeatedly in his effort to get Ballard back on the map. Under the new plan, the “Ballard extension” will terminate at Seattle Center, miles from Ballard, prompting Strauss to urge the board to “, change the name of the alignment—not the Ballard Link Extension, but the Downtown Tunnel.”

Since voters approved the Sound Transit 3 plan in 2016, Ballard has been upzoned by the city three times and grown in population, making it perhaps the most obvious contender in the region for a light rail stop. ”

The board rejected an amendment from Strauss that would have prioritized building the extension to Ballard over building a second light rail tunnel through downtown Seattle. Instead, they adopted two amendments that essentially direct Sound Transit to look for cost savings and new revenue and ask staff to come back with a date for opening the Ballard line.

Those amendments—from King County Executive Girmay Zahilay and Strauss, respectively—are essentially nonbinding and, unlike Strauss’ amendment to add Ballard to Sound Transit’s “funded projects” list, do not commit Sound Transit to actually build light rail to Ballard.

In rejecting Strauss’ amendment, board members said they were actually saving the rest of the light rail system, including the “spine” between Everett and Tacoma and light rail to Issaquah and Kirkland. Everett Mayor Cassie Franklin, who proposed an unsuccessful amendment to table Strauss’ proposal instead of voting on it, said the Ballard proposal “puts the entire system at risk, and for me that is an absolute deal breaker. We cannot risk the entirety of the system for this exploration, and we have to protect the delivery of light rail to all communities.”

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, who appeared to be leaning toward a “no” vote on Strauss’ proposal on Wednesday, cast one of just four votes in its favor on Thursday (the others were Strauss, Renton Councilmember Ed Prince, and King County Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda).

There was positive news for Seattle light rail supporters on the other end of the line, as the board approved a change that moved the long-deferred Graham Street infill station to the “funded” project list. Advocates have been pushing the board to restore the station, which will fill a two-mile gap between the Columbia City and Othello stations, for decades, ever since Sound Transit “deferred” the voter-approved station for cost savings in the early 2000s.

The Graham amendment, sponsored by Wilson and Zahilay, commits the city to spend up to $30 million on the street-level station; combined with $25 million from an existing federal grant, that would leave a gap of about $130 million, ST’s deputy executive director for enterprise planning, said. The county has not formally committed any funds to the station.

At a rally at the Filipino Community Center Wednesday afternoon, Wilson, Zahilay, and City Councilmembers Dionne Foster and Alexis Mercedes Rinck supported a vote in favor of the station, which was originally proposed as part of the voter-approve Sound Move plan that first funded light and commuter rail in 1996. Without the amendment, the Graham Street Station would have remained among the projects Sound Transit plans to advance to 100 percent design.

“Just a few weeks ago, I had the privilege of being here with so many community members, some of whom I’m looking at right now, at a fantastic rally,” Foster said Wednesday. “And at that rally I looked around and I said, ‘Did we organize for 100% design, or did we organize for trains we can ride?’ And today we have our answer: We organized for trains that we can ride!”

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

 

The Graham Street saga may be coming to a close, 30 years after voters approved the station in the 1996 Sound Move measure. (The station still has a $130 million budget gap, so construction is still far from a done deal). But the length of time it took just to get Graham—a street-level infill station that won’t require new track, much less a water crossing—back on the “funded” list is warning sign for anyone who believed that when they voted to fund light rail to Ballard, they were actually funding light rail to Ballard.

As Councilmember Rinck put it during public comment before the vote, light rail to Ballard “is not a ‘nice to have.’ This is essential infrastructure for the largest city in Washington state.”

The cuts the board made yesterday are the fourth, and by far the largest, “realignment” in Sound Transit’s history, and their magnitude appeared to surprise many board members when the agency announced the $34.5 billion shortfall last year.

The repeated realignments have led some advocates to urge changes to the way the agency is governed. Currently, the board that oversees and makes policy decisions for Sound Transit is made up of an ever-changing roster of elected officials from around the region. This setup was designed to ensure accountability—elected officials, unlike staff, can theoretically be booted for decisions voters don’t like—but it also means the board has no technical experts and little institutional knowledge, since most elected positions turn over frequently.

One of the longest-serving Sound Transit board members, King County Councilmember Claudia Balducci, told PubliCola after Wednesday’s meeting that she thinks it’s time to reconsider how Sound Transit is governed. (As Balducci noted during the meeting, “I have gone gray in the service of expanding transit in this region.” More than 15 years ago, I covered her battle against fellow Bellevue City Councilmember Kevin Wallace to build light rail on the Eastside.)

“I really do think it’s time to start talking about governance,” Balducci said. “If we’re in this constant cycle of crisis, recovery, crisis, recovery, crisis, recovery, maybe a board full of people who are expert at transit running a transit agency and delivering transit projects would be more attuned.”

“I’m an experienced amateur, but an amateur,” Balducci continued. “None of us are experts. How did we not see $35 billion creeping up on us? A hole that big opened up before we took this on. …  Maybe it’s time to evolve.”

Balducci cast one of just two votes, along with Strauss, against the final “realignment” package. (She was one of just three votes, along with Walker and Wilson, against an amendment that moved $100 million away from the Issaquah light rail extension to fund a parking garage in Renton). “I hope to vote yes in the fall,” when staff have a more detailed financial plan, Balducci said before her vote. “But to get from here to there, I want to see more progress on transparency, around the dates that we are delivering projects,” and a “path for Ballard better than we have today.”

Editor’s note: This post originally said the Ballard station would have seen nearly 150,000 daily boardings; in fact, that projection is for the entire Ballard extension. We have corrected the error.

How We Can Save Ballard Light Rail

By Seattle City Councilmember Dan Strauss

Ballard Light Rail is facing its biggest threat yet. Despite the fact the Ballard Link Extension is projected to serve as many as 148,000 people daily, the most riders of any project in Sound Transit history, the agency is considering postponing the project indefinitely to address its long-term budget issues.

That’s unacceptable. As a Sound Transit board member, I am proposing amendments to get the Ballard Link Extension back on track. They raise the question: Are we going to do everything we can to get this project done, or are we going to make this decision without exploring every option?

Since Sound Transit 3 (ST3) passed in 2016 with the promise to bring light rail to Ballard, we have planned the growth of our city around it. In that decade, Ballard has grown from being just one of Seattle’s many neighborhoods to an officially designated regional center, meaning it is zoned for the highest density of job and housing growth.

Now, under Sound Transit’s current proposal, construction of the so-called Ballard Link Extension would only be funded to Seattle Center. That’s nowhere near Ballard.

So, has Ballard Light Rail reached the end of the line? That would be a generational mistake that we can’t afford to make. Here are some of the solutions I will be proposing to the Sound Transit Board.

First, build a Ballard Starter Line.

One of the key ways Sound Transit’s plan falls short is by prioritizing nearly $11 billion in Seattle-area funding to build a second downtown tunnel over building light rail to Ballard. That’s a policy choice, not a necessity.

That second tunnel would run parallel to the current tunnel and serve roughly the same area. To maximize ridership, we should move Seattle’s funding from the second downtown tunnel to where it’s needed most—building a Westlake to Ballard Starter Line and reaching new light rail riders.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

The second tunnel could then be funded through future revenue and cost-saving strategies identified through Sound Transit’s ongoing Enterprise Initiative. The initiative has already delivered on once-delayed promises to Tacoma and Everett to finish the central “spine” of our light rail system. My amendment would not impact those or any other extension projects. It simply moves Seattle area funding within Seattle.

The second downtown tunnel is important. We need to build it. But it can’t come at the cost of building rail to Ballard.

The biggest challenge to my Westlake to Ballard Starter Line proposal is Sound Transit’s ability to answer valid questions about the impacts of the proposal with certainty before the vote. These questions can be answered but require more time. We should take that time and give this critical decision the consideration it deserves.

Second, we can improve the way we finance light rail.

By improving how Sound Transit finances light rail, we can deliver every project faster without raising taxes. Sound Transit currently only uses 30 percent of its legal debt capacity. Making some limited, commonsense adjustments to this policy would make a huge difference.

It’s not just me advocating for this. Issaquah Mayor Mark Mullet has pushed for this strategy to deliver projects sooner, before inflation drives the costs even higher.

We must also make our case with legislators in Olympia to allow Sound Transit to take longer-term bonds. While 75-year bonds may not be smart for most projects, they are a helpful tool financing infrastructure that outlasts the life of the bond—like the second downtown tunnel.

That’s not to mention the efficiencies we must put in place to rein in Sound Transit’s spending. Transit systems across the globe build and operate light rail at a lower cost. We need to use their best practices.

This month, I hosted a town hall. More than 200 community members showed up to support the Ballard Light Rail extension. I was struck by how many older people told me they voted for ST3 for their grandkids, even though they may never see the Ballard Link completed. That made it so much more heartbreaking to hear from many of those grandkids, now in their 20s, wondering whether Ballard would get light rail in their lifetimes.

It’s time for us to keep our promises. It’s time for us to build Ballard light rail.

Sound Transit’s plan and my proposed amendments are on the agenda for the next Board of Directors Meeting on May 28 at 1:30 PM. Community members are encouraged to participate and can find more information on Sound Transit’s .

Seattle City Councilmember Dan Strauss represents District 6, including Magnolia, Ballard, Phinney Ridge, Green Lake, Greenwood, Fremont and many other microneighborhoods. He also serves as a Sound Transit Board Member.

Another Shakeup on Team Wilson as Mayor’s Homelessness Advisor, Jon Grant, Steps Down

By Erica C. Barnett

Jon Grant, Mayor Katie Wilson’s chief advisor on homelessness and housing, resigned Wednesday morning after being asked to step down, PubliCola has learned. His last day will be June 1, according to an email he sent this morning to mayoral staff.

In his email, Grant listed a number of early Wilson accomplishments on homelessness, including the City Council’s quick adoption of legislation to accelerate tiny house village-style shelters around the city and work to assess and identify new shelter sites. “With these key policies and work areas accomplished, this is a good time to pivot the work to implementation within the departments, led by [the Human Services Department,” Grant wrote.

This is the second major shakeup in the mayor’s office this month. Two weeks ago, Wilson reassigned her former chief of staff Kate Kreuzer—who ran Grant’s 2017 City Council campaign—to a “special projects” role. Kreuzer and Grant were at the center of a recent conflict with the city council over Wilson’s shelter plan, which began when Wilson’s council liaison asked the sponsor of her final shelter bill, Councilmember Eddie Lin, to pull the legislation at the last minute because the mayor didn’t like some of the council’s amendments.

During a tense late-afternoon meeting with several councilmembers, Grant and Kreuzer reportedly told the council to pull the bill and make the changes. Councilmembers considered this a vast overreach—the council is separately elected and doesn’t answer to the mayor—and the meeting marked a breaking point in relations between Wilson and the council, which the mayor’s office is currently working to repair.

Prior to joining the Wilson administration, Grant was the chief strategy officer at the Low Income Housing Institute, the city’s primary tiny house village developer, which will likely be the chief beneficiary of the mayor’s tiny house-focused shelter strategy.

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

Grant has a long history in Seattle’s housing and homelessness community. In 2021, he was fired from his position as program development director at Wellspring Family Services, along with another staffer, over billing errors  During Grant’s time as director of the Tenants Union, a group of his employees wrote a letter to the group’s board accusing him of “oppressive and tokenizing treatment” of people of color and of delegating menial and administrative tasks to women of color. He resigned from that position in 2015.

Grant ran for City Council twice, in 2015 and 2017, losing to Tim Burgess and Teresa Mosqueda, respectively. During his campaign against Mosqueda, Grant confronted and took photos of a woman who was canvassing for his opponent and vilified Mosqueda for accepting a campaign contribution from a developer who happened to be one of the only women of color working as a housing developer in Seattle. As we reported at the time, Mosqueda’s supporters accused Grant of taking credit for other people’s work—including a campaign, led by Mosqueda, to pass a statewide minimum wage and sick leave law.

Grant’s allusion to HSD taking over responsibility for homelessness is notable in the context of the potential dissolution of the King County Regional Homelessness Authority after a forensic audit found major issues with the agency’s business and accounting practices. Prior to KCRHA’s formation in late 2019, HSD was responsible for administering all Seattle contracts with homeless service providers, and a post-KCHRA state could include restoring HSD to that role. Even before the audit, Wilson gave HSD authority over her shelter expansion plan, a potential first step toward moving more of the homelessness system back to the city.

In a statement, Wilson’s chief of staff Esther Handy, who replaced Kreuzer, said Grant “chose to resign… after playing a key role advancing the mayor’s highest priority: accelerating the development of new shelter with wraparound services to bring people inside. Jon helped develop and implement the mayor’s Shelter Accelerator executive order, worked to pass three key pieces of legislation, and provided support to the Seattle Social Housing Developer through a key period. We thank him for his work in these critical first months of the new administration, and wish him the best going forward. ”

“There’s a Quick Fix”: Councilmembers Pressure Mayor to Activate Police Cameras for World Cup

By Erica C. Barnett

Editor’s note: This post has been updated with comments from Mayor Katie Wilson’s office.

On Tuesday, Seattle City Councilmembers Rob Saka and Bob Kettle trashed Mayor Katie Wilson’s decision, announced in March, to leave newly installed police cameras turned off in the absence of a “credible threat” to public safety during the upcoming World Cup games, suggesting that the mayor is “afraid, apparently, to use technology from the World War II era” (Saka) and deriding the “credible threat” standard as “not a professional standard” (Kettle).

“Ask the mayor of Atlanta during the ’96 Olympics, was there a credible threat notification on that bombing? There wasn’t,” Kettle said. The Atalanta Olympics bombing, infamously, was falsely blamed on an innocent security guard, Richard Jewell; the real bomber wasn’t caught until 2003, after setting off several more bombs in Georgia and Alabama.

“Reacting after the fact is not going to get us there, and so, as someone who’s worked in this field, I do have to say, I do not understand the [mayor’s] position related to credible threat,” Kettle said.

In a statement Wednesday morning, a spokesman for the mayor’s office said, “Identifying a credible threat involves multiple experts from federal, state, and local agencies monitoring and assessing various streams of information. In collaboration with one another, they weigh incoming intelligence and jointly recommend whether to elevate security operations. Mayor Wilson’s decision whether to activate the Stadium District cameras will be informed by this group’s recommendation.”

Saka, who showed up to this morning’s public safety committee meeting decked out in 2013 Boston Marathon gear (he held up his finisher’s medal, seen above, through much of his 12-minute speech), said he “didn’t know how to protect my wife” when the bombs went off that year, shortly after the two had finished the race. “I was there. … I know what chaos feels like.”

“I don’t think that our city is is as ready as it could be to host the world for such a global event of this scale,” Saka continued. “The good news is that the solution is simple. There’s a quick fix available. This council has previously authorized and funded the expansion of critical security cameras in key areas throughout the city.”

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

 

Saka accused Wilson of wishful thinking. Waiting for a credible threat, he said, “falsely assumes and incorrectly assumes that the purported threat will always pop up on a radar every single time with no fail rate whatsoever. As someone who’s a former intelligence officer who did this work, I wish that were true. It’s just not.”

As Office of Emergency Management Director Curry Mayer reminded councilmembers this morning, the Seattle Department of Transportation already provide live camera surveillance feeds to the city’s Emergency Operations Center from hundreds of locations around the city, including more than a dozen traffic cameras around the stadiums and several around Seattle Center. The EOC, which will be heavily staffed during the World Cup, is activated during all major events in Seattle and will serve as the central hub for live monitoring and emergency response during the World Cup games.

“The cameras that we rely on in the EOC are the cameras that SDOT uses all throughout the city,” Mayer said, and are “very helpful for any kind of event.”

The EOC, notably, does not have any ability to access any of the surveillance cameras operated by SPD, which feed into a separate Real Time Crime Center at SPD headquarters.

Wilson is clearly feeling the pressure to turn the cameras on, whether or not they will actually add significant coverage to the existing web of surveillance surrounding the stadium district. Her spokesperson said the mayor “continues to consult public safety officials regarding circumstances that might warrant use of the expanded set of cameras during the FIFA World Cup. We appreciate councilmembers’ perspectives, and those will be part of ongoing discussions.”

 

KCRHA Lays Out Plan to Address Audit Findings, But Says Many Issues Need “Joint Correction” With City and County

 

King County Executive Girmay Zahilay, speaking at a KCRHA governing board meeting last week.

By Erica C. Barnett

In a “corrective action plan” issued last Friday, the King County Regional Homelessness Authority laid out the steps it proposes taking to improve its accounting practices and financial oversight after a damning forensic audit called both into question last month.

While the 157-page proposal “acknowledges” past failures, including significant issues such as overspending and sloppy accounting, it also argues that that some of the most significant issues, including a consistent negative cash balance, rest largely at the feet of King County and the city of Seattle, the agency’s two primary funders.

“Where findings involve shared workflows between KCRHA, the City, and the County, KCRHA is identifying those as shared operating-model issues requiring joint correction,” the plan says. Specifically, the plan blames an “early operating model” that “did not provide sufficiently mature shared structures for reconciliation, reimbursement timing, advance management, invoice review, funding changes, financial reporting expectations, and escalation.”

“KCRHA’s internal failures must be corrected. But the region must also establish a stronger operating framework among KCRHA, the City of Seattle, and King County.”

Th forensic evaluation, by the auditing firm Clark Nuber, found that the agency could not account for around $8 million in funds it was supposed to have, overspent its administrative budget by $4 million, and had failed to budget for $1.26 million in interest on loans from King County.

In addition, the audit found, the KCRHA appeared to have commingled funds that were contractually earmarked for specific purposes, failed to segregate financial duties among different employees, and relied on casual financial practices and “institutional knowledge” to account for spending and balance its budget, including Excel spreadsheets that showed “thousands” of edits by various people who had access to budget documents.

The audit also found the agency was operating with a a negative cash balance of around $45 million as of last July—an amount that had increased to $63 million by March. KCRHA has long blamed this recurring shortfall on its “reimbursement-based” structure: The agency pays providers and waits for the county and city to reimburse it for what it spends, requiring it to take out loans from the King County Investment Pool (KCIP) while it waits for payments.

However, an auditor with Clark Nuber said last month that this structure alone couldn’t account for the agency’s erratic and increasing negative cash balance, noting that many other agencies use a similar structure without incurring negative balances that just seem to “grow, grow, grow.”

Additionally, the audit found lax oversight of how employees used and distributed “cash equivalent” funds such as gift cards to people who participated in interviews for the KCRHA’s Point In Time Count (a data-based extrapolation that replaced an actual count several years ago) and purchase cards, or “P-Cards,” which employees could use like credit cards.

“KCRHA accepts responsibility for correcting its internal deficiencies,” Kinnison wrote in a memo to Mayor Katie Wilson and King County Executive Girmay Zahilay that accompanied the plan. “At the same time, several of the highest-priority issues — including reimbursement timing, fund advances, [King County Investment Pool] exposure, backend funding adjustments, invoice review workflows, and administrative funding structure — cross organizational boundaries. Durable resolution will require active partnership by KCRHA, the City of Seattle, and King County. KCRHA owns its internal failures; the region must jointly fix the shared operating model.”

The proposal (which, as an aside, includes many similar bullet-pointed lists and identical repetitions that suggest it may have been written with help from AI) lays out steps the agency will take to address the issues identified in the audit and improve its budgeting and financial practices.

These include identifying the $8 million in “missing” funds; increasing controls on employees’ use of cash equivalents like purchase cards; doing monthly budget closeouts; and working to segregate budget duties so that the same person is not responsible for approving an expenditure and certifying that the money was spent appropriately, for instance.

KCRHA is asking the county and city for additional funds to implement the plan, which Clark Nuber principal Mike Nurse estimated could take a year or more and cost millions of dollars. The plan says the KCRHA’s ownfinancial staff are already stretched too thin to take on the complex work involved in fixing all the deficiencies the auditors identified. “KCRHA does not currently have sufficient internal capacity or specialized technical capability to complete this body of work at the pace and confidence level required by the current environment without additional support,” the proposal says.

Additional funding could pay for new staff and temporary help, such as a “highly qualified interim CFO,” “a small technical finance and accounting team,” or “an outside consulting firm.”

PubliCola is supported entirely by readers like you.
CLICK BELOW to become a one-time or monthly contributor.

Support PubliCola

As we reported at the time, Kinnison laid off the KCRHA’s last chief financial officer in October as a cost-saving measure and has not replaced him. The corrective action plan frames this choice, which Kinnison said at the time was “due to our budget shortfall,” as a prudent financial decision made after “current executive leadership determined that the organization first needed to better understand the scope of deficiencies, the structure of required remediation, and the qualifications needed for future-state finance leadership.”

The cost savings from laying off the CFO and 12 other staffers, including the agency’s general counsel, were offset by the decision to spend millions of dollars on temp workers from outside agencies, which charge hefty fees on top of each worker’s take-home pay. Temporary financial staffers from the Robert Half agency, hired between 2023 and 2025, cost the KCRHA as much as $150 an hour, the equivalent of more than $300,000 a year.  The KCRHA used other staffing firms to provide temporary staff to do routine administrative work, like administering grants and contracts, according to contracts PubliCola has reviewed.

Other high-dollar items between 2023 and 2024 included more than half a million dollars for legal services, nearly $64,000 for PR and communication firms, and $167,000 to a company called U-Need Accounting.

It’s unclear whether city and county officials will hand over additional funding to address the problems outlined in the audit, or how much. After the recent KCRHA board meeting about the audit findings, local elected officials and board members began discussing ways to thoughtfully “wind down” the agency without interrupting services or unnecessarily risking the loss of state and already shaky federal funds.

At a governing board meeting before the KCRHA issued its report last week, King County Executive Girmay Zahilay cautioned, “I know that there have been a lot of calls to dismantle the organization and do things of that nature, but we understand that first and foremost, we have to make sure that our providers, who are out there doing that work, get paid. We have to make sure that we have an entity that can receive those critical federal resources. … Right now, we can’t jeopardize tens of millions of dollars that go into this system during this time.”

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson said little at that meeting; earlier this month, she told PubliCola that the agency’s initial response to the audit “did not adequately address my concerns.”

The corrective action plan acknowledges that the agency could cease to exist in the future, cautioning that a lot has to happen in any “transition” to a different structure. In addition to overseeing contracts and paying providers, the KCRHA functions as the Continuum of Care for the region, meaning it’s the only entity currently authorized to receive federal homelessness funds. It also oversees the region’s Homeless Management Information System, a central database that tracks every person who receives homeless services in the region, and conducts the annual Point In Time Count.

PubliCola Will Be OOO This Week

I’ll be out of the office until next Monday, May 25. Please refrain from making news until then, or email me at erica@publicola.com if you must.

Meanwhile, support PubliCola!